Curr Map-C
Theory of Knowledge
Dr. F. J. Schaack
IB Theory of Knowledge
Curriculum-Map
Focus: Discovering
ones personal epistemology
Broad-based
Concept: Acknowledging the
linkages of subjects
across knowledge Generalizations: Knowing and appreciating the various screens
of knowledge allow a thought-user to better access and apply the world as
concept
Unit OneThe Shadows of Incomplete Knowledge
|
Unit TwoThe Venn linkages of Our Mind(s) |
Unit Three Extensions of TOK |
|
Concepts: Thinking About Thought How Do We Know What We Know The TOK Interdisciplinary Wheel |
Concepts: Applying the TOK Wheel Western Philosophical Thought as Our
Thought |
Concepts: TOK has relevance in the world
outside the classroom |
|
Enduring Understandings: The students will engage the concept
of philosophy as love-of-wisdom, and discover linkages between themselves and
enduring philosophical thought. As
well, the tenet of consilience must be adopted to maximize any single area of
knowledge. |
Enduring
Understandings: TOK concepts are immediately
applicable and useful to the responsible knower, who must then be able to
express them in a variety of styles to a variety of audiences. |
Enduring
Understandings: As lifelong learners, borrowing and
coopting ideas and ideals can assist the struggle of ones personal
epistemology as conscious thought/life |
|
|
|
|
|
Essential
TEKS Questions: 1.
How is Platos
Allegory of the Cave a metaphor for the struggle of lifelong learning? 2.
How are the
6 Areas of Knowledge empowered by the 4 Ways of Knowing? 3.
Why is consilient thought necessary in modern academia? 4.
How can the
interdisciplinary knower challenge epistemological concepts via the TOK
essay? |
Essential
TEKS Questions: 1.
What are
some of the major tenets of Western Philosophy that are still directly
applicable in todays world? 2.
How can a
thinker strategically and effectively express ones thoughts, specifically
across the TOK Oral? 3.
What are the
dangers and disadvantages to strict departmental thinking? |
Essential
TEKS Questions: 1.
Why do
modern thinkers, like Pirsig, find it necessary to know beyond facts? 2.
Why is it
advantageous to the successful thinker to utilize TOK across the gamut of
disciplines? 3.
In an age of
specialization, how does being a jack-of-all-thought increase ones
dynamicism as a responsible knower? |
|
|
|
|
|
|