[Hplusroadmap] Re: [OWW-Discuss] Tapping into open source / open access and doingslightly more
Bryan Bishop
kanzure at gmail.com
Thu May 15 20:24:42 CDT 2008
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Antoon Goderis <goderisa at cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> Sorry! This got out before I finished it. I actually meant to point
> you to the data playground work and the work on Wings/Pegasus done in
> the scientific workflow literature.
>
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/E-SCIENCE.2007.72
> http://ai.isi.edu/div3/pubs/papers/gil2007wings.pdf
>
> Both rely on semantic descriptions of data types so you may find this
> helpful. Perhaps :-)
Yes. It seems to be like MapReduce/Hadoop in that it can take a job and
split it up over distributed computing elements. I know that GNU Hurd
is related, but Stallman's been running into problems for the past few
decades. The MIT amorphous computing team is also related. These job
scheduling semantic data formats (page 6 in the Wings paper) look like
something that needs to be integrated with cupsd in the SKDB model:
http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/SKDB
But not only that, but there's the issue of amorphous distributed
compilation, in that let's say you have a mechanical arm, and I have a
mechanical arm in my fab-lab, and they're different although ultimately
able to make the same things. How is this represented and taken into
account? It requires some sort of "job compiler", the job format in the
Wings case being one step of the problem. Any ideas?
- Bryan
________________________________________
http://heybryan.org/
More information about the Hplusroadmap
mailing list