To understand Hirshleifer’s
argument, consider the recent innovation of the Ginger scooter,
now relabeled the Segway, said to revolutionize urban
transportation, and grant that this unlikely prediction was actually
true. How could the inventor, Dean Kamen, profit from this
knowledge? There was a point in the development of the scooter at
which Mr. Kamen was the only one to know that urban
transportation is soon to be revolutionized, and that the automobile
itself is soon to be obsolete. Rather than surrounding himself with
patents, and hawking his knowledge to venture capitalists, as he
did, he could simply have sold short automobile stock using
whatever funds he had available to him, and leveraging to the
maximum extent possible. Then, rather than developing the scooter
himself, he should simply have mailed the blueprints to the New
York Times. As soon as the blueprints were published, the stock
owning public would naturally realize that the automobile industry
is on the way out, and the price of automobile stocks would
plummet. Mr. Kamen, having foreseen this, and having sold short
the stocks prior to publishing his blueprints, would naturally have
made a killing.